Skip to content
← Welcome to Loopio's UserVoice instance!

Loopio [Temp]

Loopio [Temp]

Categories

(thinking…)

How can we improve Loopio?

(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

3 results found

  1. Sequential review that preserves the history of the review cycle between review steps

    Need to see and report on all changes made and by whom during a multi-step library review, in addition to the final saved review.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reviews from Library  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  2. Add Entry Owner to Library Review edit page

    The Entry Owner field is missing from the Edit page for Library reviews and Reviews from Projects. Adding this field to the editor would enable more meaningful usage of the Entry Owner field and make it easier for customers to reassign content if the review needs to be assigned to the entry owner.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reviews from Library  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  3. conditional logic for reviews

    When doing multi step/assignee review the Marigold team has let us know they usually assign their legal team as the second/final reviewer. The ask is for reviews by the "legal team/conditional reviewer" to only be triggered if the reviewer before them has made any changes to the library entry. If no changes were made, it doesn't need to go to Legal and can be marked as complete

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reviews from Library  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
  • Don't see your idea?